Shares of Latin American e-commerce giant MercadoLibre (NASDAQ: MELI) fell as much as 12.5% on Monday. Investors backed away from the stock as the novel coronavirus expanded its spread over South and Central America.
According to a Reuters report, the coronavirus claimed its first Latin American victim over the weekend after one patient died in Argentina. The number of reported infections in Costa Rica nearly doubled from five to nine, and the first cases of the COVID-19 respiratory illness were seen in Colombia, Paraguay, Peru, and Chile. MercadoLibre’s investors are starting to worry about how the disease might affect consumers and small businesses in Latin America.
Image source: Getty Images.
The disease took a while to find its way into Latin America, but the numbers are starting to rack up. Furthermore, Monday marked a historic drop in global oil prices, as a price war is brewing between Russia and Saudi Arabia. Some of MercadoLibre’s largest markets — such as Venezuela, Brazil, and Mexico — are deeply invested in the oil trade and their economies will suffer if this price war drags on.
That being said, I’m not convinced that the coronavirus and oil conflict would be able to stop MercadoLibre’s solid growth in its tracks, especially since the company is branching out into adjacent sectors like shipping and payment services these days. This is a high-quality company with a bright future, and ambitious investors may want to treat this price drop as a buying opportunity.
10 stocks we like better than MercadoLibre
When investing geniuses David and Tom Gardner have a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the newsletter they have run for over a decade, Motley Fool Stock Advisor, has tripled the market.*
David and Tom just revealed what they believe are the ten best stocks for investors to buy right now… and MercadoLibre wasn’t one of them! That’s right — they think these 10 stocks are even better buys.
*Stock Advisor returns as of December 1, 2019
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.